IPA - A Guide to the Diagnosis and Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease: Case Study
A Guide to the Diagnosis and
Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease
A
case study in AD: presentation, diagnosis and
management
Compiled by Dr
Richard J Ham
Distinguished Chair in Geriatric Medicine,
Professor of Medicine,
State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA
PART 1 Presentation
During her annual physical, breast and pelvic exam,
you discuss family issues with Barbara, 47, a patient for many years. You ask after her
mother Thelma, whom you have not seen in some time. Barbara reminds you that her father
died just three years ago and is concerned about Thelma, living on her own, as she seems
to have "given up". "She is just not interested in anything, and doesn't
bother to feed herself. I really think she is losing her mind since Dad died". Thelma
is 79.
STUDY QUESTIONS
Time is short. You are already
behind schedule.
What three direct questions
will give you the most information at this point?
What are the diagnostic
possibilities?
What should your next
step be for Thelma?
PART 2
You ask three specific questions: how long has this
self-neglect and lack of interest been going on? How abruptly did it start? Is it getting
progressively worse?
The changes have been
very slow, and are getting progressively worse, Barbara tells you. Thelma's memory is not
good. She recently forgot that they had been out shopping the previous day, and she missed
her hairdresser's appointment. She recently got lost driving in a familiar place, calling
Barbara in a tearful panic from a pay telephone. Nothing like this had happened before.
STUDY QUESTIONS
Are these symptoms
related to the bereavement?
Does this fit the
profile of 'normal bereavement'?
Is a depressive illness
a possibility?
What should you do next?
PART 3
You tell Barbara firmly that you must see her mother.
Although many people become less functional when bereaved, it should not last this long.
You are concerned that she is getting worse. Barbara is surprised, feeling this to be a
normal reaction for an older person. She agrees to contact her mother, who adamantly
refuses to attend your office. "There is nothing wrong with me," she says.
STUDY QUESTIONS
Do you need to pursue
this patient, despite her unwillingness?
What dangers exist for
her and for others in her current situation?
Might she be medically
ill, and need treatment?
How would you currently
advise her daughter?
PART 4
You advise Barbara that should any medical excuse at
all come up, trivial or not, you will see Thelma. You advise her to try to observe her
mother's driving, nutrition, and access to alcohol or medications, and to involve her in
their family life, to observe her, despite her unwillingness and denial.
PART 5
Several months later,
Barbara is requesting an acute office visit for Thelma, following a fall. Thelma has
requested to come, concerned about a cut to the head. Although busy, you agree to see her
and treat her, with plans to include a cognitive assessment.
STUDY QUESTIONS
Time is short: could
your nurse assist in this assessment?
What are the minimum
baseline questions?
What further
investigations should be done, now or later?
Is there any special
advice for the daughter before collecting her mother?
PART 6
You ask your nurse to contact Barbara to advise her to
bring all her mother's medications with her. Your nurse conducts an MMSE and a CDT along
with a full set of vital signs including orthostatic blood pressures and blood tests on
Thelma, using the head injury as an excuse. Barbara is asked to complete an FAQ.
STUDY QUESTIONS
If she will consent to a blood
test, what should be included?
Is she in danger from
her head injury?
PART 7
Her head laceration is slight and treated easily. Her
MMSE score is just 14/30, with significant problems in memory, orientation to time,
visuospatial skills (word reversal, pentagon) but not language. Her daughter is astonished
that her mother believes it is 1969. The FAQ score is 18.
Medications available
to Thelma include three different OTC sleep aids, all antihistamines. Physical
examination, although necessarily brief, confirms no lateralizing or localizing signs,
gait is normal and confident and turning and balancing is quite satisfactory. There is no
orthostatic change in BP and vital signs are normal. Laboratory tests include a thyroid
screen, B12, folate, albumin, CBC, ALT, ESR, BUN/creatinine and electrolytes.
You persuade her that
she needs an "X-ray of her head". You obtain a CT scan, which shows marked
temporoparietal atrophy, with no sign of vascular abnormalities, subdural hematoma or
other space-occupying lesion.
In your brief interview
with her, you ask about memory loss, which she denies. She denies problems with sleeping.
Biological symptoms of depression, such as early morning mood disorder (diurnal
variation), early morning waking, appetite or weight change, or a sense of fatigue are all
negative. In fact, Barbara reinforces that her mother seems quite inappropriately cheerful
and satisfied with life, despite her memory impairment, and generally enjoys family
visits. She continues to drive, and has had two minor accidents in the past two months.
There appeared to have been no other falls.
STUDY QUESTIONS
What important diagnoses
have already been excluded from the differential diagnosis?
What immediate action
should be taken to prevent further impairment and danger?
Is specific treatment
available for the definite cognitive impairment?
DISCUSSION
This case demonstrates how
proactive primary care physicians can access patients with dementia who would not
otherwise be seen, or who would at least have had their investigation and care postponed.
The frequent lack of awareness on the part of the patients, mandates a flexible, yet
comprehensive approach. Patients often do not present until the symptoms are very well
established.
It is never too late to
look both for causes and for contributory factors. In this case, the potentially impairing
medications need to be removed. Driving will need to be given up, in view of the accidents
and visuospatial impairment. The family will need considerable support and advice in order
to safely maintain this lady in her environment for as long as possible. This family was
uninformed about dementia, initially accepting the changes as 'normal aging' or the result
of bereavement.
Since the symptoms are
extremely suggestive of dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) there is enough information to
justify the use of specific pharmacologic treatments for AD, i.e. one of the currently
available cholinesterase inhibitors to maintain and hopefully improve her cognitive
status. As is the general rule for prescribing in older people, it will be important to
have an easy medication to take, preferably once a day.
PART 8
Follow-up
Although there are some
initial difficulties with compliance, she does become established on medication, and on
follow-up her cognitive status actually improves a little, and she remains at a mild to
moderate level of cognitive function. She is already impaired enough to potentially
benefit from participation in a day program, to which she is persuaded to go on the basis
that a meal will be provided, and that it will be something of a 'social club' to
counteract her admitted loneliness since her husband died. Her family becomes involved
with a local Alzheimer's Association, and soon after the diagnosis of AD is confirmed,
they attend a brief course, and become informed about the illness.
Developed from scientific presentations at a special IPA meeting. Sponsored by an educational grant from Pfizer Inc and Eisai Ltd.